John Constable

John Constable, who lived between 1776 and 1837, was a painter who primarily painted environments. Much like Gainsborough, who came before him, Constable never bothered himself with the traditions that previous master’s helped establish. He preferred to paint what he saw and not to stay too close to what makes a painting “picturesque.”

This is not to say that he was out to shock people by painting controversial subjects, he just never followed the so-called Blueprints that many others followed. For example, this piece done by Constable doesn’t have anything in the foreground to contrast the otherwise flat landscape. While it was unusual to some, especially during the time he was active, personally I think it works quite well. While I do think the image is very simple, the sheer amount of detail within the sky does it justice. I find it easy to digest as opposed to other overly detailed pieces I’ve seen, which I find remarkable.

Jean Antoine Watteau

Jean Antoine Watteau, alive from 1684 to 1721 was from a part of Flanders that had been conquered by France a few years before his birth. Like many artists of this time, he too designed interiors and decorations for the rich and powerful. However, later on he had turned to paintings where he can show life at it’s most elegant without the hardships and triviality.

The Wallace Collection, London, England:

For example, Fete in the Park, painted in 1719, shows men and women simply enjoying life in a park free of worries. It conveys a sense of serenity and calmness before a time of strife and war, the French Revolution. Something I rather enjoy in paintings, a sense of tranquility, of which I can escape to. It’s rather enjoyable.

Anthony van Dyck

Anthony van Dyck, or otherwise better known as Van Dyck, was a pupil of Peter Paul Ruben who lived from 1599 to 1641. Under Ruben’s tutelage, he had acquired most of his skills in terms of rendering texture and surfaces. However, he differed from his master in terms of temperament and mood. This difference would lead him to much greater things.

This portrait, titled Charles I of England, shows the significance of this difference. Due to much of paintings being more melancholic and languid, he had become the Court Painter of Charles I in 1632 and having his name anglicized. Becoming Sir Anthony Vandyck due to this significance, it is him we can attribute to much of the Aristocracy that happened during this time.