Category: 131

R.B. Kitaj, or in full name Ronald Brooks Kitaj is an American-born painter which considered to be an influential figure in contemporary painting.  He is known for his controversial, eclectic as well as his highly personal works. Kitaj was deeply interested in contentious themes such as war, political ideologies, and issues of identity. Besides, Kitaj has a strong foundation of knowledge since he had completed several art degrees in different countries such as America, Italy, and England. At the beginning of his career as an artist, he started right at the movement of Pop art. Because of that, his works were greatly inspired by the impersonal style of Pop mixed with a few abstract brush works. R.B. Kitaj’s career collapsed with a scandal created by himself in 1994 at the Tate Gallery, London where he presented a major retrospective of his works. After the repetition of harsh criticism he received, his wife had suicided and followed by him unexpectedly at the age of 47. R.B. Kitaj was a great artist in his way although some of his pieces did not seem to be consumable. Art in the end is art, it is a platform for artists to express themselves despite if others like it or not.  

The Killer-Critic assassinated by his Widower, Even, 1997 is an abstract piece that represents his anger toward the British critique because he believed those words had made his wife killed herself. The painting is only a part of a three-part series he called “Sandra”. Sandra is Kitaj’s second wife, who had committed suicide after his major presentation in London. I like how he had used art as a method to express his feelings, which represent the characteristics of contemporary art. Furthermore, an art student needs to understand the difference between old and new forms of art. I can feel the anger through his brush works and his way of using warm colors such as red to describe the evilness of the critics.  

This piece is called The Jewish Rider, 1984 – 1985, and it is a powerful piece. The painting describes a Jewish taking a visit to the Death Camps in Poland, many years after the war. In addition, the main figure in the painting is his friend Michael Prodo, who posed for Kitaj for almost one year to complete. I like that Kitaj had chosen a quite interesting point of view to paint, which is in the middle between the corridor of the train and the cabin where the man sits. I also like the fact that he had used multiple symbols of death, loneliness, and power to convey the atmosphere of going into a place where once known as a one-way ticket to death. Overall, this is indeed a powerful piece with a thoughtful story about the dark past of the Jews.

The reason why this piece is called Cecil Court, London W.C.2. (The Refugees) because it is set in Cecil Court, which is a street known for its bookstores. Also, this piece reveals a lot about Kitaj himself as a Jewish because of the figures lying on the street, representing his experience with refugees. In addition, he and his family once had to flee Germany because of the Nazis. In my opinion, I like the composition where a man is lying on a sofa at the bottom. It is said to represent the Kitaj in his dream. It is a thoughtful painting with lots of color elements that helps tell a story of Kitaj’s life as a kid.  

This is the painting where Kitaj was interested in the Holocaust and Jewish history. It is called “The Rise of Facism”, which belongs to a series of in-depth research about the human body and its vulnerability. I can clearly see that the figures in the painting represent women in the Death Camp. Also, I love how he had limited the amount of fabric and presented more skin to show how fragile they are. It is astonishing how he could create a sense of dirtiness within a compact space with different shades of blues and greens. Hence, this is one of my favorite pieces of R. B. Kitaj. 

Some Do Not is an erotic kind of painting that shows Kitaj’s interest in nudity art. I like how he had managed to create a grainy texture, which gives a sense of vintage and filmy look. Also, I love the unusual composition where their sex position is combined to create a balanced feeling. The colors are simple yet still be able to convey the softness of the figures’ skin and the mattress. This is also my favorite piece because I am also interested in erotic and nudity art. 

Sources:

• https://www.britannica.com/biography/R-B-Kitaj
• https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)61494-3/fulltext
• http://rbkitaj.org/biography
• https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/kitaj-cecil-court-london-w-c-2-the-refugees-t04115
• https://www.artsy.net/artwork/r-b-kitaj-cecil-court-london-w-dot-c-2-the-refugees
• https://www.jmberlin.de/kitaj/en/kitaj-rise-of-fascism.php

Robert Delaunay was a phenomenon French painter that first introduced bright colors into Cubism and created a movement known as Orphism. Also, he was heavily influenced by the use of color of the Neo-Impressionists. Although he was only a part-time painter when he created his first series of paintings about abstract art. At the beginning of Robert Delaunay’s career, his works were usually figuratively like reading, nude women, and portraits. However, a major shift in his works changed dramatically when he decided to take on full abstraction. Hence, a large number of Delaunay’s paintings afterward were compositions with circles with a fine touch of vibrant colors. There is no doubt that he was an influential figure in 20th-century French painting.    

I am very much into abstract art because I love how abstract artists often find ways to tackle problems related to color science. I think Robert Delaunay had succeeded in showing the contrast between the yellow circle and the blue circle. Although it looked a bit chaotic; However, if we stood further away from the painting, we would be able to see the perfect combinations of colors. The fact that he only used various forms of circles but still managed to pull this off astonished me. I love this one!

This is also my favorite piece of abstract art by Robert Delaunay. I can see that this is more sophisticated than the Circular Forms. He had integrated some figurative elements on the bottom, which add another layer of meaning to the painting. I think that the bright colors represent the effect of lights when you see the merry-go-around in slow-motion. However, I don’t know why he named it Carousel of Pigs since I can’t see any movement of any pigs. Overall, it is an interesting piece to look at despite the confusing meaning.

Robert Delaunay had chosen to paint the interior of the Parisian Gothic church Saint-Severin for this painting. Although this is not a complete abstract, it is a form of abstract called cubism. The lines and forms within in piece are very straight, bold, and geometric. Furthermore, Robert only used about 4 colors but still be able to present the effect of lights. I like that it has a sense of depth although it is only a painting of a corridor, which proves that his skills are incredible. 

Nude Woman Reading is another piece of my favorite since I am very much into nudity art. I think the way he played with lights was clever because it enhances the body forms beautifully yet remains abstract. I wish there would be more of this painting in terms of visually. Overall, this indeed one of his most beautiful works.

Once again, nobody could deny that Robert Delaunay was a genius in controlling vibrant colors. He did an outstanding job of drawing attention to the left upper corner by introducing strong contrast between colors. The name of this painting is Sun, Tower, and Airplane, which is explicit because I can realize all those factors. The tower looks like it is the Eiffel tower since I recognize the shape from his other paintings. Furthermore, the boxes in the upper-middle seem like a plane without its machine. All those little parts combined had created such nice color harmony. I am a true fan of this particular piece because of all the things I have described above.  

Sources:

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Delaunay

https://www.wikiart.org/en/robert-delaunay

https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/artist/robert-delaunay

https://www.moma.org/artists/1479

https://www.thoughtco.com/biography-of-robert-delaunay-4777747

Annibale Carracci, a member of the Carracci family that consists of three painters: Agostino Carracci, Lodovico Carracci, and Annibale Carracci. He was the most standout of the three painters in his family and the one who was creating a movement about “recovering the old tradition of the High Renaissance from the affections of Mannerism” (Britannica.com). Unlike what the Mannerist had done, Annibale Carracci was aiming for recapturing the simplicity and beauty instead of deliberately contradict those two factors. This unique way of approaching art could be seen from some of his works such as The Beaneater, The Laughing Youth, and Butcher’s shop. In other words, Annibale Carracci wanted to bring back the simplicity of the Renaissance style combined with the way artists use light and colors in the Baroque era. In my opinion, I would prefer Annibale Carracci’s style rather than the Renaissance because of the playfulness of his themes; He would paint ordinary subjects and still be able to convey such beauty as the Renaissance’s artists would paint about religious stories. Hence, there is no doubt that Annibale Carracci could be seen as one of the founder of the Baroque art, in which had inspired many artists after his time.

The Beaneater is probably one of my most favorite pieces of Annibale Carracci because of its candid atmosphere. Although this painting would not be considered as innovative today, it had been seen as different in the 19th century when most artists would choose to paint biblical figures and portraits of prominent society members. I love how Annibale had given the people nowadays an insight of a glimpse of a working-class person in the Baroque era. 

There aren’t many pieces back then that could capture the expression of a person’s face, especially when they are laughing. This piece might not show any influence in the history of art but it does give us a bit of information about the artist himself that Annibale Carracci was a huge fan of caricature. It also shockingly appears to me about this painting is the fact it looks very modern, which proves that Annibale’s vision was ahead of his time. 

I love the fact that although this painting has some disturbing elements such as flesh, blood, and death; however, it does not make me feel disturbed at all. I think Annibale Carracci had succeeded in creating harmony in a butcher’s shop, which was not an easy task for any artist in that period because of its negativity and chaos.  

Boy Drinking is a perfect example of Annibale’s vision of reforming the world of art at his time. It shows a close observation of the real world as a naturalist like him should do. I like the inelegant movement of the figure, the distorted lights, and images through the glass. Overall, this painting alone would not be able to tell us anything. However, if we placed it with the other painting of early Baroque, we would see a huge difference in terms of innovation and revolution. 

This is his most gigantic work, and it was also his final work as an artist. The fact that it took about 11 years proves that this could be one of the most important works in the Baroque era. I love this combination of paintings because of its joyfulness and the harmony connections between the pieces. There were a few nude paintings in the Renaissance and Baroque, but to reach this level of massiveness was something that can be considered unbelievable. 

Source:

1. https://www.theartstory.org/artist/carracci-annibale/artworks/#nav
2. https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/carr/hd_carr.htm
3. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Annibale-Carracci
4. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/artists/annibale-carracci

Raphael was known as an exceptional Italian artist and famous in the High Renaissance, particularly the Italian Renaissance. He was well known because of his “intricate and expressive personal style” (Biography), which was heavy influenced by his principal teachers in Florence. There are resemblances of Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo techniques in Raphael’s paintings since he had moderately used Leonardo’s chiaroscuro and sfumato in most of his work. However, the goal that Raphael was aiming at was nowhere near those masters, it was a completely different path. He wanted his style to touch every single aspect accessible form of visual communication yet has a calmer feeling compared to the dark intensity of his teachers. In my opinion, Raphael is a master of his style because of the way he had harmonized all of the figures despite the chaos atmosphere, which was an outstanding achievement back then. “School of Athens” is a great example of this chaotic beauty, it looks vivid as well as engaging like it is inviting the viewers to “enter the space” (theartstory) and to be engulfed in the scene. I could feel the bright, cool light within those marvelous marble walls and statues. It is indeed that Raphael was a leading artist of Italian High Renaissance classicism which had later influenced many in the Baroque era.

I think it is the mixed feelings that make me fall in love with this piece. I could both feel disrupted yet pleasant at the same time. Raphael had used his chiaroscuro technique to convey the pain of the figures, especially the face of Jesus against the man’s chest which created these deep shadows that look like Jesus slowly sinks in the darkness. The pleasant feeling comes from the background, it reminds me of the rural paintings that always give the viewer a sense of calmness.

 From my point of view, this painting is so powerful because of how Raphael had separated it into two different atmospheres. It has this strong contrast that draws the viewer’s’ attention to Jesus and the glow behind his back. I love the fact that I could feel the surprisingness of the figures on the ground as Jesus about to soar into the sky. Raphael was good at showing the tightness of the scene, which I think is also another excellent proof that he was a great artist at the time.

I love how Raphael was playing with perspective in this piece. I also love the feeling it gives me as I take a closer look at it, which is the pleasantness and loveliness of this marriage. It is not a very crowded marriage, but only with a few important figures. He also created groups of figures far away, circling the building which contributed to the overall dept. The painting is easy to understand yet does not make one feels bored. It appears that Raphael had put mindful thoughts into this piece.

This is another painting of Raphael that shows how good he was with his techniques. I think that ‘Disputation of the Holy Sacrament’ is not lively as ‘The School of Athens’ but it allows us to take a look at another Raphael’s techniques, the ability to create liveness within a crowded space (tight space). If anyone could observe this piece close enough, they would be able to see that there is an order within the chaos. Every single figure in the painting is interacting differently, it seems like they are all engaging in the subject matter placed in the middle. 

Depth and Brightness are the two most standout elements of this piece, and it is also the reason why I love this painting more than the others. As a viewer, I feel like as I am standing in another room of the building, watching the figures having conversations. It feels so lively, which is super extraordinary that an artist could pull this off. Sometimes I wondered if Raphael’s method of painting is better than Michelangelo’s just because of this particular piece.

Source:

• http://www.raphael-sanzio.com/self-portrait/
• https://www.theartstory.org/artist/raphael/artworks/
• https://www.biography.com/artist/raphael
• https://www.britannica.com/biography/Raphael-Italian-painter-and-architect