Stuart Ash is a Canadian designer, born in 1942 in Hamilton, Ontario

I like Stuart’s Centennial Symbol for a long time but I did not know who designed it until I learned him in this class.

This logo is really an impressive design for me. It was on the Calgary tower when I saw it the first time. I can still remember that when I was looking down from the tower, all the buildings are having some words or logos on the top to show to the tower, and this is the one that attracts my sight the most and makes me impressive until today. I just like this kind of simple harmony but with a great meaning behind it. Almost only using the regular triangle building up the whole image is a very excellent idea, especially the pattern is also very pure. Different colours are showing the diversity and inclusion, that makes this image a very high altitude in the behind meaning.

His other works are also very simple and pure. This makes his idea can be understood easily.

When I was looking at his works, it was just like reading a kid’s story, very easy to read but very meaningful. It gives me a kind of relaxing at the spirit.

STEFF GEISSBUHLER (born in 1942), a Swiss visual designerd

Steff is a standard European artist in my stereotypes because I think the American artist focuses more on the form and shapes and Eastern artists like to develop more in the behind thoughts but the Europeans are in the middle, they always have both. Steff’s works usually have a behind meaning, and this meaning is very obvious to be seen but not like the Chinese pursuit of making the inner thoughts as high as possible. He likes to use his design to express his idea directly to make the people can easily understand what he is saying but not let them guess. This is very different from Chinese artists because as a Chinese one of our biggest pleasures is to hide the answer and let the audiences learn from the artwork by themselves.

On the other hand, Steff always makes great successes in visual design. Not like the Chinese people would like to abandon the form and shapes, Steff’s works are all very decorative crafts.

He can always extract the most important meaning while keeping the form being creative. None of them will be sacrificed for the other.

I like his design of using Type very much because his Type is very easy to be understood. Since I am a speaker of English Second Language, my eyes are very hard to be sensitive enough to quickly understand a lot of the Type-design, but Steff’s works are very friendly to me because they are so direct and powerful.

I like Steff very much, his graphic design is one of my pursuits, that perfectly merges the thoughts together with decorative shapes.

Barbara “Bobbie” Stauffacher Solomon (born 1928) is an American landscape architect and graphic designer.

Barbara’s artworks are like the exaggerated logo-designs are violently put on the architectures for the decoration and function. Thus, her works are always strong in the first visual impression to let the audience feel a sense of design. This is very different from some of the artists who silently hide their idea in the environment, for example, some of the Japanese artists would consider more on something like the connection between the point of nature sight and the level of the sea outside.

Barbara likes to use the power of design to attract people and direct them to clearly appreciate her works. She would like to use anything geometric to build her creation including the Type, Shapes, Visual errors or habits, etc. Those elements caused her designs are like a huge man writing and painting on those walls.

Absolutely, she is also connecting her design with the environment, but this kind of connection is an exclamatory one but totally different from the silent-artists. Her arts are just like a loud radio that always playing some pop music around, it is very dynamic.

Indeed, I like her style very much. I am always not a silent person and I always like to speak up for myself. Especially for the art creation, because it will be a shame for me if what I created did not make any attention. I like how Barbara expresses herself, and her style is very close to the younger’s aesthetics today. Showing the innermost passion and emotion at the front but not showing the hided consideration at the front, because this kind of arts will make the artist feel easier and be better to create what resonates people’s hearts.

Milton Glaser (born June 26, 1929) is an American graphic designer.

Milton Glaser’s works are the pop arts defined in my heart. He uses various bright colours without too much worry and makes the different elements a jumble. However, this kind of Dada-like choice is making a harmonious picture in Glaser’s hands, but not some confusing jumble.

Not like the later pop art, Glaser’s works are most focus no the meaning behind the art itself. He is the one who experiences and connects the modernism and post-modernism. This is not only caused by his activity-period, but also his constantly developing in art creation.

By comparing this Mad Men to the above Poster for musician Bob Dylan, the change is obvious. After the years-by-years influence of the rising focus in decorations, Glaser’s work became much braver than his past ones. The setting looks busier and colourful, the increasing power of the public luxuriant aesthetic is shown in his creation. I think this also caused by the large commercial designs he made because most commercial artists and designers are having a trend of getting closer and closer to the public aesthetic.

I Love New York logo is a witness to Glase’s changes. When he was designing this logo, he was the factual leader of fashion in society. However, after the change of time and era, Glaser was also trapped in a kind of templated creation. I think this is the biggest challenge in commercial design because the design is not art, it is for money. In order to be more acceptable by the public and society, artists have to be changed to meet the social requirement. I do not like this, I choose to be an illustrator and video maker.

Glaser had freedom in his creation, but he abandoned and sacrificed it for the commodity.

Paul Rand(August 15, 1914 – November 26, 1996)  was an American art director and graphic designer.

By my first impression, Paul Rand is the inheritor of the Bauhaus style but not only modernism. Although he mainly learned by himself, the style of his design strongly displays the similarity towards Bauhaus school. His colour choice is simple and pure but not less in the attractiveness of vividness. His shapes and typography design are very geometric and solid as same as the Bauhaus.

I tried to find the connection between the Bauhaus and Paul Rand but cannot have a really trustable proof. Only a few uncertain information told that Paul Klee probably had some kind of communication with Paul Rand and caused Paul Rand having the trend of a Swiss-styled internationalism. This rumour maybe not true, but I think it still points out that Paul Rand having a very obviously international style that keeps influencing the world until today. This should be one of the reasons that his design can still have a sense of fashion.

• 

• 

No matter if Paul Rand really had connected with some of the others famous or not, his style has a strong power which is not inferior to the other artists. His works dig deeply into the audiences’ cognition to extract their most naive view of the world. This must result from his self-taught experience. Some of his creations keep a childlike technique, such as colours are not considered, sort combination is random, different elements are put together by a very general reason.

I like this kind of natural part of his works. However, maybe because he made too much commercial design, a lot of his works are obviously distorted to ingratiate public aesthetics. This makes some of his works being boring at the look, not much in the behind meaning but just stopped at the standard appearance. A sense of repeating for me.